Energy Market Update – East Coast

Energy market prices

Edge 2020 round up of the last week

Week ending Friday 17th March

QLD

  • QLD prices ranged between -$315.80/MWh and $15,500/MWh for the week ending 17th March 2023, averaging $191.36/MWh.
  • Hot humid weather at the back end of the week resulted in demand increasing and spot prices spiking. Over the evening peak on Thursday spot prices hit the $15,500/MWh market cap while on Friday’s evening peak the price reached $14,500/MWh. Outside these spikes the maximum daily price remained below $400/MWh.
  • Solar output increased across the week as cloud cover reduced. Solar output peaked on Friday at 2,002MW, however there was limited solar available over the evening peaks on Thursday and Friday to suppress spot prices.
  • Wind generation was low during the high spot price events. High spot prices on Thursday and Friday occurred just prior to the evening ramp up of wind. Part of the week saw no wind generation across the state, however output peaked in the early hours of Saturday morning at 443MW. Typical of load swings on intermittent generation by 14:15 the same day wind generation had dropped to less than 2MW.
  • Gas fired generators continue to increase their output. Darling downs hava moved from an intermittent profile to a baseload / peaking hybrid by ramping up generation over the evening peak. Swanbank E continues to operate after midday through until the following morning as seen in previous weeks. Yarwun operated around the clock. During the high price events on Thursday and Friday, Townsville was joined by Roma and Oakey to cover the price spikes.
  • While Wivenhoe continues to operate every evening, the duration is reducing as spot prices decline. Kareeya has joined Barron Gorge in operating throughout the week at 86MW and 66MW respectively. Output from Barron gorge was reduced to zero prior to the evening peak on Thursday due to river safety but had returned to full load by the time the high prices occurred.
  • Coal fired availability remains high despite some reliability issues. During the high price events some generator reduced output, but most remained unchanged. The reason for the sustained high prices on Thursday was a chain conveyor issue at Kogan Creek that took 250MW out of the market. Tarong North was taken out of service during the week and the until returned to service over the weekend.

NSW

  • NSW prices ranged between -$47.00/MWh and $14,506/MWh for the week ending 17th March 2023, increasing the average to $169.43/MWh thanks to several price spikes on Thursday and Friday.
  • Solar output continues to drop again this week, peaking slightly lower than last week at 2,357MW. Similarly, to Queensland there was minimal solar output during the spot price spike on Thursday and Friday.
  • Wind generation was also low across NSW during the high spot price events. High spot prices on Thursday and Friday occurred just after wind output dropped by ~800MW. Output peaked in the early hours of Monday morning at 1,492MW. Prior to the high prices on Thursday output was also high reaching 1,440MW only hours before the spot price spikes.
  • Tallawarra returned to base load operation this week with Colongra, Smithfield and Uranquinity providing the occasional evening peak generation. All gas units ran over the evening peaks on Thursday and Friday when the high spot prices occurred.
  • Coal fired availability remains high this week with no unplanned unit outages. All coal fired units are now cycling their units across the day to reduce exposure to negative prices but are increasing output over the evening peak and into the night when spot prices are higher. The price spike was partially caused by Vales Point 5 being out of service.

SA

  • SA prices ranged between -$982.42/MWh and $1,004.70/MWh for the week ending 17th March 2023, averaging $67.97/MWh.
  • Solar generation was heavily constrained again this week due to negatives prices and system security concerns, solar peaked at 414MW with output ranging between 360MW and 410MW for the back end of the week.
  • High levels of wind generation during solar hours resulted in solar being constrained. Wind output peaked at the end of the working week at 1,173MW significantly lower than previous weeks. Wind output also dropped below 20MW for part of the week, but this was when solar output was high. High spot prices continue to occur when wind generation is low.
  • Torrens Island B and Pelican point continued to share the synchronous generation across the week. Dry creek, Quarantine and Osbourne also ran over the higher priced intervals throughout the week.

VIC

  • VIC prices ranged between -$995.78/MWh and $357.49/MWh for the week ending 17th March 2023, averaging $57.54/MWh.
  • Solar generation was heavily constrained due to negative spot prices but still managed to peak at 803MW and ranged between 700MW and 760MW across most of the week apart from over the weekend when output was constrained to 450MW.
  • Wind generation in Victoria was sporadic peaking at 2,763MW but dropping to less than 5MW at some parts of the week. Similar to South Australia, higher spot prices continue to occur when wind generation is low.
  • Hydro generation remained unchanged to last week with across the week with Murray, Eildon and Dartmouth only operating during the higher priced parts of the day.
  • Availability of coal fired generation in Victoria remains unchanged with no outages.

Retrofitting old power station sites with renewable generation

wind turbine

As coal fired generation retires the logical solution would be for renwable generation developers to use the existing connection points to install either new generation or energy storage. Generally, these locations have the best transmission infrastructure close by and have favourable loss factors.

Increasingly renewable developers are finding it hard to obtain favourable locations to build new projects particularly for solar and wind. Most developers prefer sites next to transmission infrastructure, but more and more renewable developers are struggling to find sites with good solar or wind potential. The wind sector is most influenced by site selection with the majority of the high wind yielding sites already developed.

The question is, do developers now look at redeveloping existing generation sites rather than start with a greenfield site? While there are benefits of a brownfield site, the registration and connection process of a new project is as arduous as developing a whole new new site. Additional connection studies would need to be undertaken and new projects would need to meet more stringent approval processes.

As developers are forced to develop low yielding sites the output of the projects drops and costs increase, so developing an older site may be beneficial if yield is significantly better.

The earlier wind farms were built in the late 1990’s and are now entering the final years of their life. Are these locations ideal for the next generation of wind farms or will developers opt for new sites?

Overseas data suggests repowering an existing site with new more efficient and larger wind turbines has its benefits. At this stage no Australian wind farms have been repowered.

The Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) estimates the average wind farm is 15 years old however some are close to 30 years old. The early wind farms are located where the wind resource was seen to be the best.

With offshore wind the next big thing in the industry will we also see the development of larger more efficient wind farms on the same ground as the industry pioneers?

At Edge 2020 keeping our customers informed on the energy market is a top priority for us. As the world shifts towards a more sustainable future, we are committed to playing our part by procuring from renewable energy sources, whilst continuing to secure cost-effective energy solutions for our customers. If your business is interested in wholesale or retail renewable PPAs we’d love to help you. Contact us on: 1800 334 336 or email: info@edge2020.com.au

Future investment in the grid not the cheapest option

At the end of February, Energy Ministers agreed to go down the path of a voluntary congestion relief market with priority access. Most developers and advocates of renewable energy have supported the energy minister’s decision to proceed with planning for a congestion relief market, but Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) have released initial costings showed it could cost more than $300M.

Previously the Energy Security Board (ESB) proposed a connection fee model, the voluntary congestion relief model has been estimated to cost up to 30 times more than the connection fee model.

The new ESB boss and current chair of the rule maker, the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC), recently said “the more expensive voluntary model chosen to help fix transmission congestion on the grid from the influx of renewables will ultimately deliver more benefits for consumers and result in fewer carbon emissions”.

The NEM is controlled by the National Electricity Market’s dispatch engine (NEMDE), this computer system dispatches all the scheduled units across the NEM and optimises across all inputs including bid prices, constraints, supply, and demand. This is an aging system and would require replacement to operate the ESB’s proposed connection fee model.

The Australian Financial Review revealed the congestion model would cost $76M, much higher than the $19M congestion model initially preferred by the ESB, however there are cost savings in not replacing NEMDE.

The ESB’s cost-benefit analysis of the capacity relief market would result in a net benefit of between $2.1B and $5.9B over 20 years. Apart from the economic benefits the model would reduce emissions by 23Mt over the 20 years.

Transmission congestion has increased over the last 5 to 10 years as more renewable and storage projects connect to the existing network. The market operator AEMO has been highlighting the need for new network capacity to accommodate the 127GW of renewable energy expected to enter the grid by 2050 in various planning publications. While renewable energy will displace the majority of coal and gas generation an extra 63GW of transmission capacity are still needed to facilitate the 127GW of renewables and storage likely to connect to the grid.

Under the current market rules generation from new projects can curtail the output of existing power station resulting in existing projects exporting less power. While this model works well for system security it does not work well for developing an industry and providing certainty for developers.

The ESB’s preferred option of voluntary congestion would allow developers to trade congestion relief with priority given to existing projects over new projects when accessing the grid during times congestion.

The final model will be delivered to the energy ministers by mid-2023 and is likely to be in place in 2027.

Despite being the best solution over the long-term existing energy users will pay the cost in the short term.

 Edge2020 have an eye on the energy market, enabling us to support price  benefits as well as customer supply and demand agreements. Our clients rely on our experts to ensure they are informed, equipped, and ideally positioned to make the right decisions at the right time. If you could benefit from an expert eye on your energy portfolio, we’d love to meet you. Contact us on: 1800 334 336 or email: info@edge2020.com.au

 

2022 Electricity Statement of Opportunities (ESOO) update

map of australia

Today the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) has released an update to the 2022 Electricity Statement of Opportunities (ESOO) report due to significant new information available in the market.

The ESOO provides data to inform the decision making processes of market participants, new investors, and jurisdictional bodies as they assess opportunities in the national electricity market over a 10 year outlook.

Today’s update contained material changes in availability including:
  • AGLs decision to bring forward the closure of Torren Island B (800MW) in South Australia from 2035 to 2026.
  • Origin Energy delaying the closure of Osborne Power station (180MW) in South Australia from December 2023 to 2026.
  • Bolivar Power Station gas fired power station has changed to committed status adding 123MW of supply to South Australia.
  • Snowy Hydro have confirmed a 1-year delay in Snowy 2.0 with completion now expected in December 2027.
  • Snowy Hydro have confirmed a 1-year delay in Kurri Kurri Power station (660MW) with completion now expected in December 2024.
  • The 850MW Waratah Super Battery Project in New South Wales is expected to be operational from late 2025.
  • Additional 1326MW of wind generation and 461MW of battery energy storage systems.

As a result of these changes, the market operator has called for urgent investment in generation, long duration storage and transmission to achieve reliability requirements over the next decade.

The reliability assessment is measured in expected unserved energy (USE) as a percentage of energy demand. The ESSO assessed against the reliability standard of 0.002% USE and the Interim Reliability Measure (IRM) of 0.0006% USE.

The ESOO highlighted reliability gaps in South Australia from 2023/24 and Victoria from 2024/25 which have now been filled by new gas fired generation, wind project, battery developments and the delayed retirement of existing gas fired generation outline above.

AEMO CEO said “the update reiterates the critical need for timely investment in generation, long duration storage and transmission to fill forecast reliability gaps as Australia moves rapidly away from its traditional dependency on coal generation” “Reliability gaps begin to emerge against the Interim Reliability Measure from 2025 onwards. These gaps widen until all mainland states in the NEM are forecast to breach the reliability standard from 2027 onwards, with at least five coal power stations totalling approximately 13 per cent of the NEM’s total capacity expected to retire.

The update to the ESOO provides the market with opportunities to fill the reliability gap but what happens if reliability standards drop. Historically lower reliability this has resulted in higher spot prices that flow though to end users.

Edge2020 have an eye on the energy market, enabling us to support price benefits as well as customer supply and demand agreements. Our clients rely on our experts to ensure they are informed, equipped, and ideally positioned to make the right decisions at the right time. If you could benefit from an expert eye on your energy portfolio, we’d love to meet you. Contact us on 1800 334 336 or email: info@edge2020.com.au

 

 

Storage, the future for AGL

During the record high energy prices experienced last winter combined with a rapid transition to renewable energy saw AGL Energy return a half year loss of $1B due to outages at Loy Yang A and their Hunter Valley power plant.

Despite this, AGL’s new chief executive Damien Nicks has an optimistic outlook for the second half, after a “challenged” first half. As a result of this drop in underlying profits, investors are worried about how AGL will fund its decarbonisation and whether the transition to renewable energy will occur fast enough, reinforcing the huge challenge faced by Australia’s energy-intensive industries.

AGL announced last year to committing to a $20B plan to develop 12GW of renewable energy by 2036 following pressures from shareholders and activists. A major component of the 12GW of renewables is 5GW to 7GW of firming capacity assets such as batteries and pump hydro. AGL are expecting the firming capacity assets to generate higher returns (7% to 11%) compared to wind and solar (6% and 8.5%).

Despite the decline in underlying profits, “Having a clearly endorsed strategy now, and now we have a board and management team in place means that the banks look at our transition plan and strongly support that,” Mr Nicks said. “That is a key part of us getting access to that capital.” The projects will be funded through cash flow, corporate equity, debt, and project debt.

While this may be a good strategy for AGL to improve shareholder value, it will be interesting to see how the strategy goes meeting Australia’s ambitious climate goals.

AEMO’s emergency powers prevent blackouts during high peak demand

candle due to blackout

Last Friday demand was forecast to break the all-time record of 10,119MW seen in March 2022. AEMO’s pre dispatch forecasting was showing demand peaking at 10,656MW but by 5:30 it had fallen short with Queensland’s demand peaking at 9,750MW.

With a record peak demand forecast due to high temperatures and humidity, AEMO utilised its emergency powers to prevent blackouts across Queensland. As the evening peak approached on Friday, AEMO intervened in the market and at 4:25pm  they enabled Reliability and Emergency Reserve Trader (RERT).

Between 5.30pm and 9.30pm members of the RERT panel reduced consumption on site or increased on site generation to reduce the overall QLD demand. These panel members are compensated by AEMO under individual arrangements if their services are used.

Prior to the dispatching of RERT, AEMO had sent lack of reserve notices to the market to encourage generators to offer more supply. Also, the QLD energy minister said the system would be tight, but he was confident of avoiding blackouts.

As previously discussed, Queensland relies on wind and solar generation to provide clean cheap electricity, but it is currently reliant on coal fired generation to provide the reliable backup when the sun has gone down, and the wind is not blowing.

Currently on a “normal” day demand is easily filled with a combination of solar, wind, gas and coal but on extreme day like last Friday the system becomes more dependent on scheduled generation like gas and coal fired powered stations.

Following the failure at Callide C3 and Callide C4 the state is down 840MW of availability and on extreme days this generation can mean the difference between “normal” prices and the lights staying on and very high prices and the possibility of load shedding.

If it was not for AEMO stepping in, demand may have increased, and spot prices may have certainly capped out close to $15,500/MWh. While very high prices are not good for end users, they are a signal for investment.

If high spot prices occur, it may encourage increased participation in the market and new generation being built but currently the uptake of renewable projects and storage has been slow.

Queensland has high ambitions to replace the coal fleet with renewable and storage but days like last Friday only reinforce that coal fired generation still plays a significant part in the security and price outcomes in the QLD market.

Edge2020 have an eye on the energy market, enabling us to support price  benefits as well as customer supply and demand agreements. Our clients rely on our experts to ensure they are informed, equipped, and ideally positioned to make the right decisions at the right time. If you could benefit from an expert eye on your energy portfolio, we’d love to meet you. Contact us on: 1800 334 336 or email: info@edge2020.com.au

AEMO Services shortlisted 4.3GW of renewables in NSW

AEMO Services recently ran a tender process for Long-Term Energy Service Agreements (LTESA’s) and Renewable Energy Zone (REZ) Access Rights to support investment, construction and operation of renewable energy generation and long duration storage infrastructure in NSW.

AEMO Services shortlisted 16 projects totalling 4.3 GW of generation and storage in its first auction. AEMO Services is expected to go to tender for more supply and storage in the future as NSW undergoes the transition from coal fired generation to renewables.

To enable the transition from coal to renewables, investment in NSW is likely to be over $32B to allow renewables to fill the gap as the last 5 coal fired generators in the state retire over the next 10 years.

With 16 projects being selected from the first round, AEMO Services will continue to run 2 auctions per year until the end of 2030 to source 12GW of renewables and 2GW of storage to fill the shortfall.

While the generation and storage mix has not been released, it is likely it will be a mix of solar, wind for the generation and batteries and pump hydro will be selected to meet the eight hour storage solution.

Under the auction scheme the successful projects will essentially be underpinned by a long term energy service agreement to ensure the projects receive a minimum return on investment to allow them to get project finance.

The 16 projects have until the 10th February to submit the financial part of the bids to AEMO Services when they will be assessing each project against a set of criteria including technical capability, delivery timeline, cost and social licence. Unsuccessful projects can update their submissions and submit offers in future rounds. The next auction is likely to be in July 2023.

With companies striving to meet future sustainability targets the supply of projects has been tight. Hopefully following the close of the first auction and another round in 6 months we will start to see projects reaching financial close, construction and finally delivering renewable energy to the grid.

At Edge 2020 keeping our customers informed on the energy market is a top priority for us. As the world shifts towards a more sustainable future, we are committed to playing our part by procuring from renewable energy sources, whilst continuing to secure cost-effective energy solutions for our customers. If your business is interested in wholesale or retail renewable PPAs we’d love to help you. Contact us on: 1800 334 336 or email: info@edge2020.com.au

Electricity price on the way down

Wholesale electricity prices have reduced in recent months however many end users are not seeing the benefits. It is expected the reduction in wholesale electricity prices will not flow onto household and businesses bills until 2024.

Federal treasury has analysed the wholesale electricity market in November 2022 and compared it with the prices we saw in December. Analysis showed wholesale prices dropped but Edge has previously shown renewable energy has not significantly increased, gas supply has not changed, thermal generation has remained unchanged so why the drop in the cost of electricity?

In late December the Federal government stepped into the energy market and intervened, essentially disconnecting the domestic energy market from the international energy market. This intervention put caps on the domestic price of wholesale gas and the price of coal.

Following these caps being put in place the domestic electricity market corrected, and both spot and futures contracts dropped to match an underlying cost of production for electricity based on these new capped fuel prices.

While the wholesale market dropped almost overnight it will take time for the lower costs to flow through to end users unless their load is spot exposed in Q123. Retailers had already locked in the majority of pricing for end users prior to the market dropping due to the intervention, so most end user electricity bills will reflect the historic high wholesale prices.

The federal analysis claims the price caps on coal and gas have dropped prices in QLD by 44% and 38% in NSW. Does this mean electricity bills are going to drop a similar amount? Well, the bad news is no. Retail bills are normally locked in well in advance so many large users have locked in pricing for 2023. The underlying energy costs are only part of the retail bill as other costs include transmission, distribution and AEMO charges which unfortunately have not decreased and have the potential to increase as the market evolves.

While the market intervention was a necessary step to insulate end users from the escalating international energy prices due to the war in Ukraine, the next step is to continue to drive down prices as the country transitions to renewables. We must keep in mind the transition to renewables will come at a cost. Renewable energy requires more transmission lines to connect the generators to the grid, they require specialised services to maintain the security of the grid and will also require a higher cost generation or storage to provide firming for around the clock supply.

While the underlying cost of electricity will drop with more renewable energy entering the market, the other costs on the electricity bill will now represent a higher proportion and are likely to increase.

Edge2020 have an eye on the energy market, enabling us to support price  benefits as well as customer supply and demand agreements. Our clients rely on our experts to ensure they are informed, equipped, and ideally positioned to make the right decisions at the right time. If you could benefit from an expert eye on your energy portfolio, we’d love to meet you. Contact us on: 1800 334 336 or email: info@edge2020.com.au

Renewables, battle of the billionaires

Singapore lit up at night

Previously, Edge has discussed the electricity markets’ move away from coal and gas to renewable energy and firming technologies. Last week it was announced that the Australia-Asia PowerLink Project (AAPP) better known as Sun Cable had gone into voluntary administration. AAPP was planned to be the world’s biggest solar and battery storage project.

Sun Cable was backed by some of the largest renewable energy developers in Australia, namely Mike Cannon-Brookes from Grok Ventures and Squadron Energy’s Andrew Forrest.

It appears from the outside the decision to wind up the company was due to a lack of alignment of the companies’ objectives by the shareholders but is there more to the story.

Sun Cable was to provide renewable energy generated in Australia and transport it via a 4,200km underseas cable to Singapore. Powering the project would be a huge solar farm near Elliott in the Northern Territory. The 20GW Elliott solar farm would be firmed with a 42GWh battery.

The first part of the Sun Cable project was planned to start construction next year, resulting in 800MW of renewable energy flowing into Darwin by 2027. Currently Darwin has a maximum demand of around 250MW so either the generation project will need to be resized or the solar farm will need to be constrained until it is able to export. With several solar projects already built in the Northern Territory but not approved for connection, the NT market may become very constrained as a result of the single line transmission between Katherine and Darwin.

Late in 2022, Sun Cable announced it had signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Indonesian government to unlock more than $150B in “green industry” growth in the region. The MoU has a broad plan to build key industries to improve Indonesia’s GDP. These industries include mining, energy, transport, food, agriculture and IT infrastructure, all an interest to mining and IT entrepreneurs.

With Indonesia already approving a sub sea survey permit it is likely the sub sea power cable could reach Indonesian shores and provide cheap renewable electricity to the region to assist in its growth.

Following the announcement of Sun Cable going into administration the federal government remains positive on the future prospect of Sun Cable. Are two billionaires too much for a business like this? Will one of them retain control of the company?

Feedback from Minister Bowen suggests following discussions with senior individuals at SunCable, there are no plans to stop moving forward with the project. Minister Bowen said

“It’s a change of approach and corporate structure, but of course in that regard that is entirely a matter for them”

Following a restructuring process, it looks like AAPP will still go ahead but most likely led by only on billionaire.

The Safeguard Mechanism – the big stick came out

Carbon emissions safeguard mechanism

The Safeguard Mechanism is the legislation which came in in 2016, it was designed to reduce the emissions of the industrial sectors within Australia with targets, or baselines, capping the amount of emissions each facility can emit. The flaw was that the large industries could continue to re-set these baselines to ensure that as production increased, so did the baseline, and as such the emissions would also be increased without penalty. In the Financial year 2020 – 2021, these 215 large emitters made up 28% of Australia’s Carbon Footprint.

During the election campaign the Albanese government stood on a pledge to tighten the legislation around these 215 facilities to ensure that they were contributing to the now legislated target of a 43% reduction in emissions by 2030 (v’s 2005) and net zero by 2050.

Well yesterday, 10th January 2023, the government after extensive round tables, consultation papers and responses released their “draft” position paper. I use the word draft in quotes as the timeframe for change to this draft is less than likely. Responses are due by the end of February and it going in front of ministers in April to be enshrined with a 1st July 2023 start date. I think we can safely say the government have set their cap on their desired outcome.

So, what has been decreed. Well in brief, bar the reduction in baselines, 4.9% annually until 2030 and a review following that, and a cap and trade scheme to allow under baseline emitters to benefit from a new (non-financial!) ACCU called a Safeguard Mechanism Credit (SMC), the big changes and costs, will come to those emitters who will be eventually pushed onto non-site specific variables and forced to use “industry benchmarks”. They can apply for exemptions until 2030 but even these will be under tightened scrutiny and cherry picking your years of production will no longer be allowed. This will be a blow to some who rely on their baselines to reduce costs in those high production and high emitting years. These emitters will also no longer be able to sit on high reported, calculated or fixed baselines and will loose their site-specific variables by the end of this decade in an already reducing baseline decline rate.

To cap this cost, the government are proposing a ceiling for the ACCU market. They propose this to be set at $75/tCO2-e initially and increasing by CPI +2% annually after the first financial year, FY24. With spot ACCUs currently trading around $34.50 (source https://accus.com.au/) this is quite a ceiling indeed.

The proposal is also tightening the benefits which can be gained by the Emission Reduction Fund Projects, with no new projects to be sanctioned and no renewal of current projects. Even those in existence will only have a two-year grandfathered period before the abatement cannot be utilised within the accounts.

Interestingly though the parts I found most intriguing were the future papers we can expect. The Chubb review was, I can now assume, purposely vague on international credits and I believe this is due to the implication from the safeguard paper that we can expect a further review, likely to come out this year, which will look at the usage of “high quality international offsets” within the ANREU. These could then be rolled into many types of legislation for Carbon Neutral claims as per Climate Active current accreditation, including Safeguard legislation.

The other interesting area is around carbon leakage with an investigation to be undertaken if Australia should follow the EU and implement a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). It would basically create a plug to stop carbon leakage between countries. i.e. if you moved production to a country which was less ambitious in its carbon policies you would still have to pay the “leakage” of that carbon, or to import that substance, if it was not manufactured within a country with similar carbon ambitions, you pay the carbon cost to use it in Australia.

Overall, there is a lot to un-pick in this paper but following extensive consultations I think (bar the ACCU ceiling price) little will shock industry. It is a “hybrid” approach to get the government on track without losing industry along the way. There will be some winners, especially those on industry set baselines, initially able to bank SMCs, but overall the government have balanced a carbon abatement requirement without hampering industry too much. There will always be nay sayers who want more, say this isn’t enough and want to move quicker, but we cannot forget the economic climate we are in at the moment and the turmoil yet to unfold. I say hear ye hear ye to the DCCEEW, this one balances the tightrope of industry and climate ambitions well.

Kate Turner is Edge2020’s senior manager markets, analytics and sustainability. Through a passion that renewable energy solutions are key to any climate change solution, Kate supports our clients to manage their portfolios and any associated risk within traditional markets as well as complex renewable energy portfolios. Kate is hands on in procurement development and implementation for our clients and leads our market regulatory and advisory sustainability services. If your business is interested in wholesale or retail renewable PPAs we’d love to help you. Contact us on: 1800 334 336 or email: info@edge2020.com.au